The Critical Digital Literacies framework for educators aims to capture the various dimensions and sub-dimensions of critical digital literacies which are vital for educators and students living, teaching and learning in a digital world.
Read the Framework here.
The Empathy Package includes tools, guides and materials for learning and teaching empathy, such as study modules, videos, tests ans surveys, task templates and guidelines. There are separate sections that provide support for 1) children and young people, 2) teachers, and 3) parents. Some materials are only in Finnish, some also in English.
Empathy, Emotional intelligence, Children and youth, Parents, Teachers and schools
text | video | image
educatinal technology package with multiple resources
These educational tools for students aim at raising awareness on the violent contents of media and promoting civic engagement and media/digital literacy. They have been developed under the project e-EAV (e-Engagement Against Violence), supported by the DAPHNE-programme 2012-2014.
About the project
“The project looked at the pronounced populist and racist movements and groups in seven European countries, i.e. Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Italy, Great Britain, Slovenia.
The project analysed media and their use by populism actors. It looked into communication strategies of movements and their messages directed against “the Other”. The aim was to contribute to empowerment of youth and of teachers in counteracting racism”
media literacy, citizenship, propaganda, videogames
text | image
text: presentations image: pictures
Consortium of e-EAV (e-Engagement Against Violence) project
This is a visual resource that teachers and students can use to deepen the theme of misleading information type. This infographic offers a useful classification, indicating also the characteristics of these information and their impact. This resource has been developed by EAVI – the European Association for Viewers Interests. It is an international non-profit organisation in Brussels that promotes media literacy in the perspective of active citizenship.
fake news, media literacy, misleading
EAVI – the European Association for Viewers Interests
The term “data” is becoming probably a sort of buzzword. What do we
mean with “data”? How do you feel about the word “data”? And why
should we need to be “data literate”?
You might also come across “Big Data”, “Open Data” ,”Data Science”,
Datafication” and “Datafied” as words. And overall, some of this
words have positive connotations and others, very negative
implications for our lives. Clearly, we deal with a problem with many
facets. As educators, we need to explore them to understand which is
the message we want to cater to our students.
Overall, “data” refers to the digital data collected through our
interaction with digital spaces, apps, and smart technologies,
including the Internet of Things. And while this data might be part of
open, public knowledge and could be mined to produce new human
activities, like Artificial Intelligence, there are many connected
problems. Not only the form into which data are collected, without the
consent of the people from which such data are extracted, could be a
concern. Also, the surveillance, the end users’ manipulation through
nudges and recommendations, or the misrepresentation of collectives
are emerging issues connected to all the practices around data. As a
result, there is increasing concern in developing data literacy.
Data Literacy has received great attention over the last few years in
relation to school practices and has been identified as one of the
dimensions of the DETECT Critical Digital LIteracies framework.
Although the issue of Data Protection is usually addressed by relevant
policies at institutional level (mainly in relation to GDPR compliance)
less attention has been paid to raising educators as well as students’
awareness regarding the various aspects and sub-dimensions of data
literacy. Within the DETECT project the aim is to develop educators’
understandings of the multifacet issue of data literacy and also
support them with enhancing their students’ practices in relation to
This interactive, self-paced learning resource introduces three
perspectives on data literacy:
– Data Protection and Safety
– Open Data to develop critical citizens’ data literacy –
– Data Justice: exploring the dark side of data
The resource can be used either in educators’ workshops or
continuing training. Also it could be a good source of learning for
initial teachers’ education.
Moreover, the teachers could adopt some of the concepts for selfpaced
learning aimed at design lesson plans on data literacy for
secondary school learners.
Data Literacy, Data Protection and Safety, Open Data, Data Justice
text | image
Website with integrated resources: video, documents, interactive graphics
GoogleSites, mp4, Mentimeter presentation
Juliana Raffaghelli and Anastasia Gouseti
Attribution – Only noncommercial uses – Share Alike (CC BY-NC-SA)
Ideally, this resource should be introduced prior to a workshop activity. The resource is aimed at working with educators in three phases: 1- Prior reading and exploring the teachers’ own approach to data 2- Workshop with discussion 3- Design for Learning
1) To understand how data shapes our contemporary society, with relevant impacts on the educational context 2) To explore at least one of the several three perspectives on the problem of data in the society 3) To be able of designing for learning to support the development of data literacy in one of the three areas: data protection and safety; open data for critical citizenship; data justice.
Modeling (e.g. thinking aloud technique based on teacher shaping conceptual reasoning), Discussion (e.g. students engaged in an open debate on a certain topic), Project work (e.g., students working in small group to develop a project), Self-paced learning based on video and interactive resources
Min 90 minutes Max 240 minutes
Self-paced learning: 90 minutes per 3 learning pathways at learners’ will. Workshop: 240 mins (90 self-paced, 30 presentation/orientation, 60 groupwork, 60 plenary session) The activity starts with two introductory videos (15 mins) In the two videos, the concept of "data cultures" is introduced to reflect about the complexity of data in our societies. Dat cultures stands for a contextualised use of data, within education institutions, that allow the users to learn and to embrace balanced perspectives on data, to learn to live well with the above mentioned technological change. Therefore, the embedded idea is that data literacy requires not only technical, but also aesthetical, political and ethical approaches to understand and use data. The videos are followed by a brief readings, that prepare the participants’ choice of an activity of the three pathways offered. The learners are invited hence at select one of the pathways [ASYNCHRONOUS ACTIVITY, 90 minutes] We introduce three perspectives about data, as a complex problem, and invite you to select one to start learning. § Data Protection and Safety - Combining a reactive data "mindset" and the need to protect personal data, we'll explore the role of educators in supporting their own and ther students' awareness, security and safety while going through digital spaces. § Open Data to develop critical citizens' data literacy - Combining a proactive data "mindset" and the possibility to access to public, open data, we'll explore how open data can be used for civic education, also cultivating data visualization and data storytelling. § Data Justice: exploring the dark side of data - Combining a reactive data "mindset" and the need to access and generate fair public, open data, we'll explore the role of educators in promoting data justice. Therefore, there is a moment to share, discuss and prepare for designing a lesson plan as final outcome [ASYNCHRONOUS ACTIVITY, 40 min interactions with resources] + [ SYNCHRONOUS ACTIVITY, 90 min workgroup and 60 min plenary session] The participants engage with resources connected to the perspective chosen, and will debate around possible and future pedagogical practices.
Self-evaluation (e.g. students self-evaluate their products), Peer evaluation (e.g. mutual evaluation among students), Course evaluation by the participants.